I JUST HAND LETTERED A SIGN FOR THE BALCONY HERE AT MY PRIVATE STUDIO. BEEN WANTING TO DO IT FOR A YEAR BUT HAD OTHER MORE IMPORTANT PROJECTS AT HAND BETTER LATE THAN NEVER... HAND LETTERING IS A LOST ART THAT IS BEING PRESERVED HERE IN THE HEART OF L.A. CLASSES ARE BEING HELD AT THE LOS ANGELES TRADE TECH..
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Friday, January 30, 2009
TATTOO OPEN
CHECK OUT THIS PAINTING I DID A COUPLE YEARS AGO IT SITS AT THE LAST LAUGH. DEDICATED TO THE OLD SCHOOL TATTOOERS WHO LAID THE FOUNDATION FOR ME TO WALK ON. IF YOUR INTERESTED IN THE ORIGINAL CONTACT MY ASSISTANT asst@mistercartoon.com SERIOUS INQUIRIES ONLY PLEASE! IF NOT WE ALSO HAVE PRINTS YOU CAN GET OFF MY WEB STORE www.mistercartoon.com
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Anthropomorphism
John Kricfalusi has just posted an interesting piece on the use of dog-nosed faces on otherwise very human cartoon characters. This is a phenomenon mostly found in Disney's "Uncle Scrooge" and Donald Duck" comics illustrated by Carl Barks, although it's been seen in animation as well, like Nelvana's "Rock and Rule", for example. I agree with John that this type of character is rather off-putting, as it is neither distinctly human nor typical of the "Funny Animal" type of cartoons so prevalent in animation and comics. Though the Carl Barks dog-nosed characters are rather benign, this trend also begat the "Furry" movement, which usually also seems to have a sexual bent to it in the art of its many practitioners.
At this very point in time, I am coincidentally covering the topic of "Anthropomorphism" in my Character Design course at Sheridan College, so I'd like to take this opportunity to address the distinction between "Funny Animals" and "Furries". Some time ago, I'd posted this piece on "Four Degrees of Anthropomorphism" that covers most of the main approaches to creating animals with human traits and personalities in various animated shorts and features. By breaking it down into these four common approaches, I hope to teach my students how to create a set of rules to apply to the way they handle animal characters in their film stories, so that there's a certain logic and plausibility that is maintained in what they're trying to communicate to their audience. And from a purely visual standpoint, I'm also trying to impress upon them where to draw the line between an anthropomorphic animal that possesses human traits, before crossing that line and instead ending up with a "Furry", being essentially an animal's head stuck on top of a fur covered human body.
Ideally, an anthropomorphic animal should maintain something of the actual animal's physique, even when walking around on two legs and wearing clothes. If you look at this still from Disney's "Robin Hood", you will note that Robin himself is still very much a fox on two legs, and that if placed back down on all fours without his costume, he would be very much at home in a film like "Lady and the Tramp" as a caricature of a real fox but with a human personality. Same thing with Little John the bear. When done really well, an anthropomorphic animal character should be initially visualized as a "Human Type", then translating those human physical traits and reinterpreting them in the animal design. I discussed this topic here.
For those of you familiar with "The Country Bear Jamboree" at Walt Disney World, the Disney artists were very successful in creating a cast of bear characters that looked like caricatures of the type of performers one would see on the stage at Nashville's "Grand Ol' Opry". Here is a picture of "Big Al", as an example of what I'm talking about. The facial design and physical body type are very much based on the character's human equivalent, yet never losing sight of the physical design of the actual animal either. For many students, this seems to be rather confusing and a challenge to pull off, while for others it seems to be a very natural, intuitive process.
For the uninitiated, just so you have a clear idea of the distinction between what I'm describing here and the aforementioned, dreaded "Furries", here is a link to some Google images of the latter. As you can see, they are more mutant than animal. As a general rule of thumb: If it is embarrassing to look at your animal character when he or she is naked, chances are you've drawn a "Furry"!!
Just to solidify the distinction, here is a clip from Disney's "Bedknobs and Broomsticks" that shows how to successfully translate animals into two-legged anthropomorphic characters while still maintaining the animal's physique. I really love this clip, as all of the gags are based on the traits of the actual animals, yet every one of them also conjures up a "Human Type" equivalent as well. Wouldn't you agree that the big ugly rhino puts one in mind of some thuggish, skinhead footballer? Of course, the sleek and agile cheetah is more of the David Beckham type.
At this very point in time, I am coincidentally covering the topic of "Anthropomorphism" in my Character Design course at Sheridan College, so I'd like to take this opportunity to address the distinction between "Funny Animals" and "Furries". Some time ago, I'd posted this piece on "Four Degrees of Anthropomorphism" that covers most of the main approaches to creating animals with human traits and personalities in various animated shorts and features. By breaking it down into these four common approaches, I hope to teach my students how to create a set of rules to apply to the way they handle animal characters in their film stories, so that there's a certain logic and plausibility that is maintained in what they're trying to communicate to their audience. And from a purely visual standpoint, I'm also trying to impress upon them where to draw the line between an anthropomorphic animal that possesses human traits, before crossing that line and instead ending up with a "Furry", being essentially an animal's head stuck on top of a fur covered human body.
Ideally, an anthropomorphic animal should maintain something of the actual animal's physique, even when walking around on two legs and wearing clothes. If you look at this still from Disney's "Robin Hood", you will note that Robin himself is still very much a fox on two legs, and that if placed back down on all fours without his costume, he would be very much at home in a film like "Lady and the Tramp" as a caricature of a real fox but with a human personality. Same thing with Little John the bear. When done really well, an anthropomorphic animal character should be initially visualized as a "Human Type", then translating those human physical traits and reinterpreting them in the animal design. I discussed this topic here.
For those of you familiar with "The Country Bear Jamboree" at Walt Disney World, the Disney artists were very successful in creating a cast of bear characters that looked like caricatures of the type of performers one would see on the stage at Nashville's "Grand Ol' Opry". Here is a picture of "Big Al", as an example of what I'm talking about. The facial design and physical body type are very much based on the character's human equivalent, yet never losing sight of the physical design of the actual animal either. For many students, this seems to be rather confusing and a challenge to pull off, while for others it seems to be a very natural, intuitive process.
For the uninitiated, just so you have a clear idea of the distinction between what I'm describing here and the aforementioned, dreaded "Furries", here is a link to some Google images of the latter. As you can see, they are more mutant than animal. As a general rule of thumb: If it is embarrassing to look at your animal character when he or she is naked, chances are you've drawn a "Furry"!!
Just to solidify the distinction, here is a clip from Disney's "Bedknobs and Broomsticks" that shows how to successfully translate animals into two-legged anthropomorphic characters while still maintaining the animal's physique. I really love this clip, as all of the gags are based on the traits of the actual animals, yet every one of them also conjures up a "Human Type" equivalent as well. Wouldn't you agree that the big ugly rhino puts one in mind of some thuggish, skinhead footballer? Of course, the sleek and agile cheetah is more of the David Beckham type.
FEBURARY ISSUE OF JUXTAPOZ
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
CARTOON RETRO: The Art of SHANE GLINES Vol. 1
* UPDATE: Now available from the Brand Studio Press store! THIS BOOK WILL BEGIN SHIPPING ON THURSDAY FEB 5th. LIMITED QUANTITIES WHILE SUPPLIES LAST
From Brandstudio Press books, 48 full color pages, hard cover, book retails for $24.95.
There is no content crossover with Sparrow and very little crossover with S*Curves (now out of print). The book
will premiere at the New York Comic Con, Feb 6-8 and will be available from the Brand Studio Press online store and from selected retailers soon after.
From Brandstudio Press books, 48 full color pages, hard cover, book retails for $24.95.
There is no content crossover with Sparrow and very little crossover with S*Curves (now out of print). The book
will premiere at the New York Comic Con, Feb 6-8 and will be available from the Brand Studio Press online store and from selected retailers soon after.
CODE OF THE STREETS
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
ROADSTER SHOW UPDATE
IT WAS AN HONOR AND A PRIVILEGE TO SHOW AT THE ROADSTER SHOW IN POMONA THIS WEEKEND AND HUMBLING TO RECEIVE A TROPHY.. THE BEST CUSTOM CARS IN THE COUNTRY TRAVEL TO COMPETE HERE AND SOME OF THE MOST PRISTINE ORIGINALS AS WELL.. THEE ICE CREAM TRUCK WON 1ST IN ITS CLASS, BEST INDIVIDUAL DISPLAY AND BEST USE OF COLOR.
Monday, January 26, 2009
Sunday, January 25, 2009
OFFICIAL
ITS OFFICIAL MARK MILLER IS THE FIRST TO COME IN HERE AND GET THE CLOWN HANYA MASK AND HE BLASTED IT ON THE NECK AT THAT. BOO YA! SO FOR ALL OF YOU WHO WANT TO COME IN AND BITE THE HOMIE YOU HAVE TO TAKE IT UP WITH HIM.... HA! HA! HA! MARK IS COOL AS SHIT AND BROUGHT THE HOMIE RAKAA FROM THE DILATED PEOPLES TO CHOP IT UP AS IT GOT PUT DOWN.
IF YOUR THINKING OF THAT HANYA CLOWN CHEW ON THIS.....
website- www.fightshark.com
myspace- www.myspace.com/fightshark
blog- www.purefight.org
radio show- www.mmaweekly.com
IF YOUR THINKING OF THAT HANYA CLOWN CHEW ON THIS.....
website- www.fightshark.com
myspace- www.myspace.com/fightshark
blog- www.purefight.org
radio show- www.mmaweekly.com
Saturday, January 24, 2009
RAY DAY!
Friday, January 23, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)